Black-box predictions
A prediction can rank risk without clarifying which intervention might change the outcome.
aitiolin is a browser-based interface for interactive DAG building, identification analysis, causal effect estimation, robustness testing, and time-series causal analysis. It helps users move from “what correlates with churn?” to “what may happen if we actually change something?” in a transparent, non-production setting.
Backdoor paths, admissibility checks, and adjustment sets.
Parallel estimators, placebo tests, subsamples, and sensitivity sweep.
Many AI projects produce scores without clearly showing why a result appears or whether the underlying assumptions are defensible. For private users and researchers, that makes intervention reasoning harder, not easier.
A prediction can rank risk without clarifying which intervention might change the outcome.
Any intervention strategy needs a causal question: what happens if we change pricing, support, or retention spend?
Visual graphs allow domain experts, analysts, and other reviewers to examine assumptions together.
Instead of stitching together multiple libraries and notebooks, this open-source prototype concentrates graph drafting, identification, estimation, and robustness into a single browser-based workflow for private use.
Drag variables onto a canvas, create directed edges, and persist graph state across sessions.
Get AI-assisted edge suggestions with reviewable evidence and accept/reject decisions.
Check DAG validity, admissibility, adjustment sets, and candidate identification strategies.
Run estimators such as linear regression, propensity score matching, and weighting.
Compare estimators, run refutations, and inspect a compact robustness score.
Analyze rolling-window stability where a time dimension is available.
The workflow is structured so users inspect assumptions before effect estimation and robustness before interpretation.
Bring in a private dataset and inspect available variables.
Place nodes on the canvas and draw directed edges.
Use AI assistance, then keep humans in control of final structure.
Validate whether the treatment–outcome question is answerable.
Specify the intervention question you want to analyze.
Run one or more estimators against the causal query.
Inspect placebo tests, dummy outcomes, subsamples, and sensitivity.
Use estimates and robustness context for learning, not automated or business decisions.
In a churn setting, a prediction model can tell you which customers are risky. A causal workflow can help you ask whether an intervention - retention spend, service upgrades, online security, or support changes - may reduce churn under explicit assumptions in a private analysis context.
Would increasing retention or marketing spend actually reduce churn, or only correlate with it?
Represent drivers of churn as a causal graph and make assumptions visible.
Compare the estimated effect, robustness checks, and practical context to document a hypothesis for further investigation. The result is not a recommendation to change marketing or retention spending.
aitiolin is developed as an open-source prototype for private experimentation and learning, not for autonomous or operational decision-making. The graph, identification logic, and robustness checks are visible and reviewable.
The causal graph makes structural assumptions visible instead of hiding them in a black-box score.
Edge suggestions can be reviewed, accepted, locked, or rejected by a human user.
The dashboard encourages stress-testing before drawing conclusions from an estimate.
aitiolin is an open-source prototype for transparent causal exploration and hypothesis development. It is intended for private use, experimentation, and learning, not for production or business decision workflows.